Author name: admin

Press Releases

Influencers, Concerned Americans Call on Congress to Retract Praise for CAIR 

Washington D.C. –  Since the New Tolerance Campaign (NTC) launched its latest campaign on Jan 17., nearly 5,000 Americans have signed a petition calling on 120 members of Congress to walk back their unwarranted gushing letters of praise they sent to the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) to celebrate their 25th anniversary. Given the stakes of America’s legislators putting support behind such a troubling group, many notable influencers have promoted the petition, including Clinton accuser-turned activist Juanita Broaddrick, Parkland survivor Kyle Kashuv, and author and activist Andrew Pollack. In addition to providing a way for concerned Americans to tell Congress directly that they shouldn’t be endorsing CAIR, NTC is sending “CAIR Bears” (Care Bear toys) to the offices of eight key Members of Congress for each 1,000 petition signatures we receive. We already have 4 rounds of bears on their way to the Hill, and more are eagerly waiting to be shipped out.  This effort is critical as CAIR has spent 25 years giving a platform to people with unapologetic anti-Semitic views. The group was an unindicted co-conspirator in one of our country’s largest terrorism financing trials, and continues to voice support for terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah. The 25th anniversary gala, where the letters were presented, was headlined by Linda Sarsour, who was recently removed from the Women’s March leadership team because of her blatant anti-Semitism, and Rep. Ilhan Omar, who has been praised by white supremacist leader David Duke for an on-going streak of anti-Semitic comments that have shaken Congress.  In light of the campaign’s momentum, New Tolerance Campaign issued the following statement: “It is hard to believe that these 120 Members of Congress are all ignorant of CAIR’s problematic history. While America is a free country and they can endorse whomever they like, they are making a grave mistake elevating a group like CAIR. Doing so demonstrates terrible judgment and leadership. It is imperative that they stand against racism in all forms and retract their support rather than enable it as they’ve done by sending these letters. Anything less is un-American. We are encouraged that so many have already taken a stand by signing the petition, and optimistic that our elected officials will choose to do the right thing.”

Past Campaigns

Tell Congress to Retract Their Praise for CAIR

Anti-Semitism has no place in our country, and especially in the halls of Congress. Just yesterday it was reported that a bipartisan group of 120  Members of Congress endorsed the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization with 25 years of giving a platform to Jew-haters. This is a group that was an unindicted co-conspirator in one of our country’s largest terrorism financing trials, and was accused of supporting the internationally recognized terrorist group Hamas. While many understand CAIR’s true nature, no one has made the effort to communicate clearly to Congress that praising CAIR is intolerant. That silence ends now. For every 1,000 petitions signed, NTC will send one “CAIR Bear” item (okay, they’re actually Care Bears) to eight Members of Congress who should know better than to support this racist group: Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Rodney Davis (R-IL), Joe Kennedy (D-MA), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Robert Menendez (D-NJ), Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Rob Woodall (R-GA) * The Petition We, the undersigned, send this message: You supported a resolution in 2019 that proclaimed opposition to hate and anti-Semitism. Then, you wrote a letter of endorsement for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), an intolerant and anti-Semitic organization, on its 25th anniversary. You can’t oppose anti-Semitism and support CAIR. Although CAIR leaders claim to oppose anti-Semitism, they routinely put blatantly anti-Semitic speakers front and center at some of their biggest events, including their recent 25th anniversary gala. No organization that truly opposes anti-Semitism would highlight such prominent bigots. One of the 25th anniversary gala headliners was Representative Ilhan Omar, who has used multiple anti-Semitic tropes, some remorselessly, that are internationally recognized as anti-Semitic, including the dual loyalty canard and promoting the falsehood that Israel controls the world. Her comments were even praised by white supremacist leader David Duke who called her “the most important Member of the US Congress!” Another headliner was Linda Sarsour, who recently left the Women’s March leadership after her anti-Semitic baggage became too much for the organization to bear. Sarsour was also caught in a double standard when she did not include any reference to the Jewish people in a statement commemorating the Holocaust after previously attacking a White House statement the year prior for an absence of a reference to the Jewish people. She has also accused Jewish progressives of having dual loyalty with Israel. Other examples of CAIR speakers espousing anti-Semitism include Professor Hatem Bazian, a UC Berkeley professor who Tweeted anti-Semitic cartoons and spoke at a CAIR Minneapolis event, and CAIR Los Angeles Executive Director Hussam Ayloush, who called for the “termination” of the Jewish State of Israel (as well as the Islamic Republic of Iran). Opposing anti-Semitism and supporting CAIR is contradictory. If you actually oppose racism, you must revoke your support of CAIR. Do it now.   *Up to 25,000 signers

Press Releases

New Tolerance Campaign Calls on Time Magazine to Fix Inexcusably Bad Article Explaining Soleimani Assassination to Kids

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Washington, D.C. – New Tolerance Campaign is mobilizing concerned citizens to call on Time Magazine to rewrite an article that badly mischaracterizes the situation with Soleimani and Iran. The article by Time for Kids’ executive editor, Jaime Joyce, called “How to Talk to Your Kids About the Situation with Iran” has received negative attention for its truly terrible job explaining the facts and the one-sided picture it paints. In the name of responsible journalism that presents the full picture truthfully, especially when it comes from a noteworthy magazine that aims to shape young American minds, Time for Kids must rewrite the article from the perspective of a genuine desire to educate. Should Qasem Soleimani have been killed by American action? Joyce seems to believe the answer is “no” and has written an article for parents on how they can explain this to their kids. President Trump’s decision is falsely portrayed as poorly received by anyone who matters, and a reasonably adequate explanation of why Soleimani is considered a terrorist is avoided altogether. Instead, Joyce has written a bogusly even-handed article that gives parents a one-sided playbook for casting doubt on an event that many around the world, including many in Iran, have reacted to as historically positive. Joyce points out that the death of Soleimani “is a difficult topic to explain to kids.” Problem is, it’s harder if one avoids details, as she does. Whether one believes that the assassination was justified, making that judgment requires knowing the objective and well-known facts which Joyce chose not to include: Soleimani was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, and over 600 American military members. The problems begin right away with Joyce’s description of Soleimani, who was far more than “a top military leader in Iran,” as she oversimplifies it. He was the man who had been directing military action in Iraq, Syria, Gaza, and elsewhere for more than a decade, representing conflicts in which hundreds of thousands have been killed, including Americans, with no end in sight. Soleimani wrote to then US General David Petraeus in 2008, informing him that “you should know that I, Qasem Soleimani, control the policy for Iran with respect to Iraq, Lebanon, Gaza, and Afghanistan.” The Washington Post recently noted that “According to the Defense Department under both Trump and Barack Obama, Iran’s activity in Iraq included the provision of and training on several weapons systems deployed against Americans and Iraqis.” Regarding American deaths, the US government’s most recent estimate is 608. Further, Soleimani was more than just a crusader against the West. His role in fomenting the Syrian civil war has also been well reported, with many attributing Bashar al-Assad’s hard-earned and horrific success to Soleimani’s support and direct, routine intervention. The current death toll estimate of the conflict is 400,000. Yet the word “Syria” does not appear in Joyce’s article even once. It is easy to notice that Joyce likely disagrees with the decision to assassinate Soleimani. She presents the decision by President Trump in the light of how some people have reacted negatively to it but has left out any of the many examples of agreement that followed the event. Joyce also avoids pointing to the significant evidence of support among Iranians for Soleimani’s death that immediately followed it, and proactively perpetuated the myth that Iran is a country in collective morning. Maybe Joyce believes that America’s children can’t handle the truth. But at NTC, we believe our kids are resilient, and must not be coddled by being told the blandest version of a semi-truth, as Joyce has done. Time for Kids and Joyce must immediately revise their explainer to include some of the ample evidence of Soleimani’s character and a representative description of the reactions in Iran and around the world. They owe it to America as journalists to be responsible and present the full picture, especially when dealing with such an important issue.

Press Releases

New Tolerance Campaign Calls on Sen. Cory Booker to Push for Jersey City Anti-Semite Resignation

For Immediate Release Jan. 7, 2020 In response to a Jersey City School Board Member’s anti-Semitic comments, last week New Tolerance Campaign began mobilizing concerned citizens to send messages to Jersey City’s Mayor and Board of Education calling on Board Member Joan Terrell Paige to resign. Terrell-Paige posted a now-deleted diatribe against the Jewish community after the December 10th shooting that took place at a local kosher market, calling some Jews “brutes” and sympathizing with the shooters. She has not apologized and refuses to resign. So far, over 550 principled people (and rapidly counting!) have joined the NTC effort to force Terrell-Paige’s resignation. Already, we have seen progress. Following weeks of silence and inaction, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop responded to an NTC activist, affirming that “We will continue to put pressure and look for avenues as I feel it is unacceptable what [Terrell-Paige] said.” Later, he published a tweet on Jan 3rd reiterating that he viewed her words as anti-Semitic.  We applaud Mayor Fulop for continuing to take a stand and have removed him from our list of people that we ask our supporters to contact. Nevertheless, NTC will not let this issue fall off the radar! After this small early victory for the campaign, NTC has decided to enlist our members’ help in asking U.S. Senator Cory Booker to show principled leadership and support her resignation. This past Thursday, a candlelight vigil was held in Terrell Paige’s honor. Since then, supporters have swarmed a Board of Education meeting to back her. This is an astonishing display of support for blatant anti-Semitism from a community leader. What a terrible example for the school system that Terrell Paige is supposed to lead! With that in mind, NTC is calling on U.S. Senator Cory Booker to weigh in. As both a national figure and a representative of the state of New Jersey, we must provide the leadership needed to clarify that bigotry is fundamentally unacceptable and that our community leaders must be held to the highest standards of tolerance. The campaign can be found here. NTC is encouraged by the support we have received so far and will continue to put pressure on Terrell-Paige to resign. ###

Blog

The Uneasy Intersection of Tolerance and Humor  

This week, the most notable thing to come out of the Golden Globes was not a list of winners, but Ricky Gervais’s scorching jokes, mainly made at celebrity attendees’ expense. Perhaps his most shocking line was, “You say you’re woke but the companies you work for, I mean, unbelievable – Apple, Amazon, Disney – if  Isis started a streaming service, you’d call your agent.” The reviews were very mixed. Some were offended. Others were highly entertained. But the primary consequence of the whole affair was a huge bump in Gervais’s Twitter follower count.  Also in the last month, news broke much more quietly that a UMass Amherst professor was removed from their position for showing a parody video featuring Hitler that students had made for extra credit in an accounting class in a prior year. The video added comical, accounting-related subtitles to a clip from the movie Downfall, attributing lines to Hitler such as: “Don’t you dare finish that sentence or I’ll send you to a chamber. And it won’t be the chamber of commerce. I can guarantee that.” The professor’s decision may or may not have been a good one, but just showing the video with jokes about on par with Gervais’s cost the professor her job.  Our nation is having something of a crisis when it comes to how we handle humor. Much of humor-based entertainment is all about being irreverent and pushing the envelope. And individuals will clearly have different views about how far is too far and in what context.    If we shut down every stand-up comic, movie, and TV show every time someone is offended, the comedy genre will disappear very quickly! And in the case of the UMass professor, attempts to add a little levity into otherwise dry subject matter will go the way of the dodo. And no one wants that.   But we obviously don’t want to give a pass to any vile sentiment because it was “just a joke.” So what can we do?  When someone says something that offends us, the goal should be a conversation, not a cancelation. By all means, state your views, but do in a way that aims to bring improvement, not punishment. You can also choose to vote with your time and money – if people aren’t watching a certain comedian, they’ll shape up or move on – without attempting to destroy any chance of future employment for the offender.  If students had approached the UMass professor instead of going straight to the administration to demand her dismissal, it’s entirely possible that the professor would have agreed not show the video again or perhaps even given the students another perspective on this issue.  Now we will never know.  Humor can be an important tool to expose what’s wrong with society in a more palatable way or just to make an accounting class a little more engaging. It can also be an excuse to display bigotry in a less obvious form. Let’s reward humor that makes society better, treat firmly but fairly with humor that makes society worse, and have the humility to know that the line may not always be a clear one. 

Press Releases

New Tolerance Campaign Calls on the Jersey City Board of Education and Mayor Fulop to demand Board Member Terrell-Paige Resign in Response to Anti-Semitic Diatribe 

Anti-Semitism is alive and well on the Jersey City Board of Education. One board member was given a free pass after posting an anti-Semitic rant following an anti-Semitic shooting. Jersey City Jewish students should not have to be concerned that the officials running their schools view them as “brutes” or deserving of violent attacks. That’s why New Tolerance Campaign is calling on all decent Americans to stand with Jersey City’s Jewish students and faculty by calling for the resignation of  Board of Education member Joan Terrell-Paige.    Terrell-Paige made her anti-Semitic comments in response to the December 10th shooting at a kosher market in Greenville, NJ. Two shooters killed a police officer and three others in the attack which authorities said was ”fueled by both anti-Semitism and anti-law enforcement beliefs.” In discussing the attack on Facebook, Terrell-Paige used classic anti-Semitic tropes to accuse the local Jewish community of marginalizing the local black community, finishing her post by asking “Are we brave enough explore the answer to [the shooters’] message?” The Facebook post is now deleted, but @ReaganBattalion posted a screenshot on Twitter:    Initially, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop and NJ Gov. Phil Murphy joined many voices in calling for Terrell-Paige’s resignation. According to CNN, outgoing Board President Sudhan Thomas said he was going to request Terrell-Paige’s resignation at the next school board meeting, but the meeting was then canceled for vague “potential security risks” and Sudhan’s time in office ended at the close of 2019.   Since then, Jersey City officials have been strangely silent, but we have not forgotten that an anti-Semite sits on the school’s education board. NTC is calling on all concerned citizens to make sure Terrell-Paige resigns by sending messages to the full School Board (including Terrell-Paige) and Mayor Fulop demanding that they continue to push for her resignation.    Anti-Semitism has no place in our nation, and especially not in our public schools. Terrell-Paige must go!   View the campaign here: https://bit.ly/366R82k 

News

PJ Media: New Non-Partisan Group Calls on Amazon to Drop Scandal-Plagued SPLC

Big tech and the media routinely cover for the scandal-plagued far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), but a new non-partisan initiative has launched a campaign urging Amazon to drop its reliance on the corrupt liberal group. Since its creation two months ago, the New Tolerance Campaign (NTC) has inspired more than 2,000 Americans to demand that universities and influential companies like Amazon hold themselves to “consistent standards of tolerance.” NTC “promotes ‘unbiased tolerance’ by encouraging organizations, businesses, elected officials, and government agencies to maintain clear standards of acceptable conduct.” In that spirit, NTC has rallied Americans against Amazon’s decision to rely on the SPLC’s biased “hate group” accusations to exclude organizations from its AmazonSmile charity program. NTC reminded its followers that the SPLC faced a devastating scandal back in March involving claims of racial discrimination and sexual harassment. That scandal led to the firing of the SPLC’s co-founder, and it broke open even further as employees came clean about being “part of the con,” exaggerating hate by padding the “hate group” list and “bilking northern liberals” into cutting big checks. The SPLC has millions in offshore bank accounts in the Cayman Islands. “New Tolerance Campaign is dedicated to calling out the unequal application of tolerance in mainstream American culture, which has become far too common in recent years. AmazonSmile’s use of the SPLC is a clear case of this ongoing problem,” an NTC spokesperson told PJ Media on Wednesday. Read more from PJ Media

Blog

Hallmark Channel Presents: A Christmas Outrage

This week, Hallmark learned the hard way what happens when a company doesn’t apply their values consistently.   If you missed the news, here’s the short version: The Hallmark Channel ran a series of ads from wedding planning website Zola that featured two lesbians kissing. A religious group complained. This spooked Hallmark, and they pulled the ads. Then the internet found out, and #BoycottHallmark quickly became a top trend on Twitter. So, Hallmark apologized and said they would reinstate the ads.   We’ll give Hallmark this – they have successfully united the country in one way: now everyone with an opinion on the matter is upset with Hallmark.  Hallmark is a private company, and can legally choose which ads to run on their network. But that doesn’t save them from facing the consequences of their inconsistency on tolerance after signaling that they care more about the public perception of their values than the values themselves.  Perhaps the Hallmark experience will be enough to deter other companies and organizations from making the same mistake of inconsistency. We hope they also consider the damage done to an already bitterly divided nation when they signal certain values, but withdraw from them when the going gets tough. Both sides will walk away feeling attacked and marginalized (we’ll refrain from saying if these feelings are justified). Undoubtedly, fundraising emails have already gone out from both sides trying to capitalize on the anger generated.   Which reminds us: this situation proves that companies listen. Public pressure campaigns work.   At New Tolerance Campaign, we are using such tactics to move American companies and organizations towards clear and consistent values. Those values can and, in some cases, should change over time, but in a thoughtful and transparent way. This would help ease some of the bitterness and confusion dividing our country and provide a path towards meaningful conversation instead of reactionary outbursts.   We hope that you’ll help us work towards that goal so that we can create a more tolerant world. 

Press Releases

NTC Calls For Upholding Free Speech at Truman State

Photo of Naomi Mathew, courtesy of Rivera Eye Photography for FIRE The New Tolerance Campaign is launching a campaign in support of the free speech rights of Naomi Mathew, a student at Truman State University who had her application to start a student group associated with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) denied by the school because of the “’emotional risk’ of ‘hostile’ confrontations and the ‘reputational risk’ of associating with PETA.” In denying the application, Truman State appears to be denying Mathew’s First Amendment rights. This decision must be reversed.  On Tuesday, December 10th, Mathew and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) pushed back. In a detailed letter to Truman State President Dr. Susan Thomas, FIRE outlines the problematic history of Truman State’s administration in denying almost half of prospective clubs, including “ones advocating for first-generation college students, transgender students, children with cancer, and more.”   In the press release announcing the effort, FIRE’s Lindsie Rank said that “Truman State can’t reject student groups just because it doesn’t like what they might say, or what others may say in response. The law is clear: Naomi Mathew and her fellow students are free to exercise their First Amendment freedoms without a university committee making subjective decisions behind closed doors about what students can and can’t handle.”   The FIRE letter to Truman President Dr. Thomas concludes by requesting that she confirm by December 20th that Truman State will recognize Mathew’s group, Animal Alliance, and “suspend use of subjective criteria for evaluating recognition of student organizations.”  NTC couldn’t agree more. Universities and colleges are instrumental in the intellectual maturation of future generations, and efforts they make to stifle legitimate and legal speech sends the absolute wrong message to their students. Join NTC in supporting Mathew’s right to free speech. Tell Truman State President Dr. Thomas to approve Animal Alliance and revise the criteria for recognizing student organizations to eliminate risks of violating students’ First Amendment rights.  ###

Blog

How Can You Be For Free Speech AND Have A Comment Policy? 

This is another great question that we’ve received as we’ve introduced ourselves as a brand-new organization. Last week, we tackled a question about the limits of tolerance. This week let’s delve into free speech.  To begin with, we need to get on the same page about what free speech is, as defined by the First Amendment. Freedom of speech means that the government cannot limit or punish you for what you say. This is essential for enabling citizens to speak truth to power, and it’s rare to have this right, even among other democracies.   In America today, you can express any opinion about the president or other officials without fear of arrest. Of course, it is a two-way street. If you tweet mean things about them, they may tweet mean things about you. But that’s the point – there can be a conversation when no one fears being thrown in prison.  But the First Amendment has reasonable limits – the classic example being that you can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater. You also can’t engage in libel or slander or lie under oath.  American free speech protections only apply to what is and isn’t legal. American citizens can and should set their own rules for acceptable conduct in their homes, organizations, social networks, and businesses.     Just like setting healthy boundaries is important in interpersonal relationships, it’s important in online forums. No one wants to be overwhelmed by spammers. Spaces designed to include children often take them into consideration. And social media companies need to keep the experience of using their platforms enjoyable in order to stay in business.  At NTC, we want to foster an environment for healthy discussion. We believe that means allowing all viewpoints, even the ones we disagree with.    However, as an organization focused on tolerance, we do insist on respectful treatment of others on our Facebook page. You can express your view about the subject at hand without personally attacking other commenters, using excessively strong language, or going on off-topic rants.  Do you dislike our comment policy? Think one of our campaigns is misguided? Feel free to comment about it on our Facebook page. We welcome your feedback. All we ask is that you keep it relevant and respectful. Want to go on a profanity-laced tirade about the Yankees pitcher? We support your legal right to do so. Just please do it somewhere else.  

Scroll to Top